Sunday, January 21, 2018

'Germany is still CRUMBLING' - Merkel risks economic SHOCK with weakened EU leadership

A DIE WELT journalist has claimed that Angela Merkel will preside over a crumbling country that faces an uncertain economic future.While today's SPD endorsement of a grand coalition will likely see Angela Merkel return to power, a prominent German journalist claims the country will be stuck "at a standstill". This afternoon, the SPD gave its lukewarm approval of a renewed Angela Merkel-led "grand coalition" regime, more than four months after Germans voted in the election. The absence of Germany on the European stage has gifted Emmanuel Macron the chance to lead the EU, as seen in his visit to Britain this week.Speaking on the BBC's Dateline programme, Thomas Kielinger, of Die Welt, commented that Germany needs to lead Europe to maintain its economy. He said: "If Merkel was a business, it would be time to issue a profit warning. Germany is at a standstill and nobody seems to want to govern anymore. "I'm afraid a strong Germany will not emerge anytime soon. It will not be in a position to represent the country as a whole." The BBC panel remarked on the complacency that had set it within German leadership. Mina Al Oraibi, from The National, added: "After a while, these economic structures will start to erode. "The instability means no long-term decisions can be made."French journalist Marc Roche claimed that the regional divides in Germany will also see the country distracted by internal matters. He said: "Germany is crumbling regionally. Europe has to deal with Brexit, refugees, the crisis in the eurozone, Poland. "It's an urgent matter but Germany is blocked and will continue to be blocked. "It is required that Germany steps up for a leadership role in the EU, its economy demands it "You can’t take the benefits of the EU economy but leave the business of Europe to others."

One in eight Swedish women will be raped in their lifetimes and that is a low estimate

Shocking new statistics have been released by the Swedish bureau for crime statistics (BRÅ). It shows a detrimental increase in rapes in the last few years in Sweden.
The figures show that in 2017 there were 7,230 rapes in Sweden. A 10 percent increase from 2016 which saw 6,720 rapes. Not taking into account any further increases in rapes in the future, this would mean that 12.2% (or 1 in 8) of women in Sweden will be raped during their lifetimes.
These are shocking numbers and should be enough to make anyone question what on earth is going on in Sweden. This is simply not sustainable.
If you want to do the math for yourself: There are 5 million women living in Sweden. Taking into account an average lifespan of 85 years, with 7 230 rapes per year, this will mean that there will be 614,550 women raped during a woman’s lifetime, meaning that 1 in 8 of all women in Sweden will, sadly, be raped.
However, if you look even further back, the statistics can get even worse. From 2007 – 2017 there was a 34% increase in rapes. That means if this trend continues, in 20 years’ time there will be 12,982 rapes every year happening in Sweden.
That means 22% (or a bit over 1 in 5) women will be raped during their lifetime if that trend continues. These are truly horrible and shocking statistics.

Sweden prides itself on being a “feminist” country championing “equality”. But the sad reality is that Sweden perhaps has one of the worst rape rates in the world.

FREXIT: Macron Admits French Public Would ‘Probably’ Vote to Leave the EU if Given the Chance

French president Emmanuel Macron has made a shock admission that the French public would “probably” vote to leave the European Union if given the chance in a referendum.

The globalist poster boy made the comments during an interview with BBC presenter Andrew Marr.
“You always take a risk when you have such a referendum, just ‘Yes’ or ‘No’ in a very complicated broadcast,” he told the broadcaster.
“If France had had a referendum it might have had the same result,” suggested Marr.
“Yeah, probably,” admitted the president — to the surprise of many observers.
The 40-year-old appeared to catch himself as soon as the words were out of his mouth, however, adding quickly: “Probably, in a similar context, but our context was very different, so I don’t want to make any, I mean, take any bets.”
He assured Marr that, in the event of a French referendum, he “would have fought very hard to win [for the European Union].”
The last time the French people were allowed a vote on the European Union was when they were asked to vote for the European Constitution in 2005, with 55 per cent of voters rejecting it.
(The Constitution was subsequently repackaged as the Lisbon Treaty and passed by the French government without a public vote.)
If France had held an EU referendum it "probably" would have been the same result - French President Emmanuel Macron tells 
Outlining his own take on the British context prior to the Brexit vote, Macron said it was his understanding that the “middle-classes and working-classes — and especially the oldest in your country — decided that the recent decades were not in their favour, and that the adjustments made by both [the] EU and globalisation — for me it was a mix of both of them — was not in their favour.
“And second, I think one of the reasons was precisely an organisation of our EU probably which gets too far in terms of freedom without cohesion. Towards free market without any rules and any convergence.”
He also suggested that the idea of a referendum on EU membership was wrongheaded regardless of the national context, however, saying: “It’s a mistake when you just ask ‘yes’ or ‘no’, when you don’t ask people how to improve the situation and to explain how to improve it.”
Macron, who visibly fidgeted and bit his nails after the gaffe, became fearful of appearing in front of the press shortly after winning the presidency.
Eyebrows were raised in July 2017 when journalists were told that the president’s thoughts were “too complex” for members of the media, and ill-suited to questioner answer sessions.

Reuters News Agency subsequency reported his desire to be a “Jupiterian” president — “a remote, dignified figure, like the Roman god of gods, who weighs his rare pronouncements carefully”.

German city bans new “refugees” after two Muslim migrant assaults on non-Muslims

“Earlier this week, Brandenburg state police reported that two male Syrian teenagers were arrested under the suspicion of injuring a German teenager in the face with a knife….The incident happened just days after a group of three Syrian asylum seekers, aged 14, 15 and 17 years old, attacked a man and his wife outside a shopping centre, according to a police statement.”
But “a community group told local media that a group of neo-Nazis had assaulted refugees on the morning of New Year’s Day.” Any police report? Or are we simply to believe that anyone and everyone who opposes the Muslim migrant influx is a “neo-Nazi”? Could they just people not wanting to see their society and mores overwhelmed and ultimately destroyed?
“German city bans new refugees as anti-migrant mood increases,” by Barbara Woolsey, Telegraph, January 20, 2018 (thanks to Mick):
An eastern German city has imposed a temporary ban on new refugees in an effort to stem a number of recent violent incidents.
Cottbus, about 120 kilometres southeast of Berlin, has been rocked by violence from refugees and right-wing extremists since the start of this year.
Earlier this week, Brandenburg state police reported that two male Syrian teenagers were arrested under the suspicion of injuring a German teenager in the face with a knife.
The 16-year-old sustained non life-threatening injuries in what started as an altercation between Syrian and German school acquaintances near a tram station.
The incident happened just days after a group of three Syrian asylum seekers, aged 14, 15 and 17 years old, attacked a man and his wife outside a shopping centre, according to a police statement. The 15-year-old was handed a “negative residency permit” by authorities, effectively ordering him and his father to leave the city.
Cottbus, a small university centre with a population of just over 100,000, has taken in around 3,000 asylum seekers since German Chancellor Angela Merkel opened Germany’s borders in 2015 at the height of the refugee crisis.
Coupled with a sluggish economy, the considerable influx has fuelled anti-immigrant sentiment among locals, and the city is home to one of Germany’s largest right-wing extremist scenes. Authorities counted 145 right-wing radicals living in Cottbus last year.
A community group told local media that a group of neo-Nazis had assaulted refugees on the morning of New Year’s Day, while last weekend a group of around 100 masked neo-Nazis marched in an illegal demonstration through the city centre.
Brandenburg’s state interior minister Karl-Heinz Schroeter told German broadcaster RBB on Friday that the ban on new refugees would be in effect “for the next few months”….

Under the previous deselected Austrian government: Secret anti-terrorist exercises -- Asylum seekers filmed diligently!

The Innsbruck building complex "Heim am Hofgarten", once reserved for senior citizens, has recently become a "hotspot" in a double sense: on the one hand, it is crammed full of asylum seekers, and on the other hand, specialists from the Ministry of the Interior (BMI) regularly carry out anti-terrorist missions in this particular building. The "protection seekers", who usually have modern mobile phones, watch the spectacular anti-amok training sessions with great interest: Officers are closely watched, photographed and filmed as they climb facades and rehearse the overpowering of terrorists with police attacks. According to the "Tyrolean Social Services", the refugees are, at least in part, Illegals who have been caught freshly at the Brenner. So they are people of whom it is not even known exactly who they are. According to the sign at the entrance, the Executive Board openly announces when it will complete its operational training in this building, namely on Tuesdays from 8 am to 6 pm.

Racism: Labour Party Charges White People Extra to Attend Corbyn Rally

The Labour Party is charging white people extra to attend a Jeremy Corbyn rally in Loughborough, Leicestershire, on February 17th.

Labour activists and supporters attending the rally will be charged £40 if they are white and £30 if they are non-white,” reports the Mail on Sunday.
“The basic price of a conference pass is the same for all members but, at the request of our East Midlands Regional Board, the party will subsidise part of the cost of this year’s conference pass for BAME [Black and Minority Ethnic] members to encourage attendance and improve representation,” explained a Labour spokesman.
Of course, this really means that the basic price of a conference pass is not the same for all members, with white people being singled out to pay more than any other ethnic group.
“This is racism. In effect, Labour is levying a tax on the basis of the colour of a person’s skin. It shows their contempt for the white working class,” responded Andrew Bridgen, the Member of Parliament for North-West Leicestershire.
The Tory pointed out the “insanity” of charging a poor white Labour activist more for a ticket than Leicester East MP Keith Vaz, a rich ex-lawyer born in the Middle East.
“In Corbyn’s Orwellian parallel universe we are all equal, but some are more equal than others,” Bridgen added.
The move comes shortly after Corbyn’s Shadow Education Secretary Angela Raynerconceded that statistics show that white working-class people, and white working-class boys in particular, are in many respects at the “bottom of the heap” in British society, with worse life outcomes than any other demographic.
“I think it’s because as we’ve tried to deal with some of the issues around race and women’s agendas, around tackling some of the discrimination that’s there, it has actually had a negative impact on the food chain [for] white working boys,” she admitted.
However, she appeared to row back shortly afterwards, declining to tackle to the so-called ‘positive action’ provisions in the Equality Act which allow white people to be excludedfrom internships and training opportunities, and instead pinned the blame for the situation on white “culture”.
Citizens Advice suggests that “Someone providing goods, facilities or services must not … provide any of these things on less favourable terms or conditions because of your race”, suggesting the Labour Party’s decision to financially penalise white people in Loughborough may well be illegal.
Breitbart London has contacted Leicestershire Police to ask if they share this assessment, and if they intend to take action if so.

The force’s Contact Management Department said constables “have been made aware of this and we are looking into it”, and provided an incident number.